Skip to content
Friday, October 9, 2026
Discover the latest jackpot opportunities in London. Expert…

Will Additional Countries Pursue Australia's Example in Restricting Social Platforms for Teenagers Under 16?

The Australian decisive policy to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are watching closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing group of states are exploring similar measures.

  • Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that smartphones and networks are "stealing our children's childhood". Legislation could be formalized soon.
  • The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
  • The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an similar ban is "a potential tools on the table".
  • In Spain, the leader has urged parliament to pass a proposal increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
  • In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
  • The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding statement supporting a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is given. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these services, the move does not enact binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a solid first step," commented a leading MEP driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "based on conclusive data".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. However, the administration pledged to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. An organization set up by the relatives of a girl who was lost after viewing harmful online content argues that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to create products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," commented a prominent peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, action is largely happening at the local level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

  • The state of Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
  • Florida has enacted a law barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
  • Virginia has enacted a law limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional time needing parental permission.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced laws requiring parental consent for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from some figures to copy Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of the West, additional countries are similarly exploring options.

  • Malaysia intends to ban social media for under-16s starting from next year.
  • The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, world organizations adopt a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has warned that social media bans have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The body notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

Even as this worldwide discussion unfolds, the actions of Australia and others demonstrate that governments around the world are less and less content to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.

SC
By

Sarah Cunningham

A seasoned gambling analyst with 10 years of experience covering UK jackpots.

London Jackpot Project

Type to search articles.